paganinpurple:

gehayi:

nonsense-choir:

gnotknormal:

theconcealedweapon:

An action being “punishable by a fine” basically means “legal for rich people”.

Oh wow. That’s…

This is why all fines should be income based. They should carry the EXACT same weight of punishment to anyone who commits the act. That way poor folk aren’t bankrupted into desperation or jail by a minor offense and rich people can’t get away with shit.

Like they do in, for example, Finland.

Finland, Home of the $103,000 Speeding Ticket

Reima Kuisla, a Finnish businessman, was recently caught going 65 miles per hour in a 50 zone in his home country—an offense that would typically come with a fine of a couple hundred dollars, at most, in the U.S. But after Finnish police pulled Kuisla over, they pinged a federal taxpayer database to determine his income, consulted their handbook, and arrived at the amount that he was required to pay: €54,000.

The fine was so extreme because in Finland, some traffic fines, as well as fines for shoplifting and violating securities-exchange laws, are assessed based on earnings—and Kuisla’s declared income was €6.5 million per year. Exorbitant fines like this are infrequent, but not unheard of: In 2002, a Nokia executive was fined the equivalent of $103,000 for going 45 in a 30 zone on his motorcycle, and the NHL player Teemu Selanne incurred a $39,000 fine two years earlier.

“This is no constitutionally governed state,” one Finn who was fined nearly $50,000 moaned to The Wall Street Journal, “This is a land of rhinos!” Outrage among the rich—especially nonsensical, safari-invoking outrage—might be a sign that something fair is at work.

This is than perfect way to produce fines which are fair to all

What If Roe Fell?

drst:

akireyta:

sauvamente:

sauvamente:

rapeculturerealities:

Roe v. Wade — the landmark Supreme Court case establishing access to abortion as a constitutional right — has been settled law for over 40 years, yet remains under constant attack. With President Donald Trump in office, we face potentially the greatest threat to reproductive rights in more than a generation. The Center for Reproductive Rights updated our 2007 report, What If Roe Fell?, in order to answer the question on everyone’s mind on the 45th anniversary of Roe: what will happen if Roe were toppled in your state, the day after?

click to see how your state rates

Honestly read this especially if you in the South

Since y’all don’t click links you see all that red, no protection without Roe v Wade NONE

Popping this short story into here because reasons

I’ve been thinking about that story since yesterday.

What If Roe Fell?

rubykgrant:

nonsense-choir:

gnotknormal:

theconcealedweapon:

An action being “punishable by a fine” basically means “legal for rich people”.

Oh wow. That’s…

This is why all fines should be income based. They should carry the EXACT same weight of punishment to anyone who commits the act. That way poor folk aren’t bankrupted into desperation or jail by a minor offense and rich people can’t get away with shit.

I remember in an economics class, this one kid kept on arguing that taxes shouldn’t increase for rich people and decrease for poor people. we kept trying to explain to the why it was actually fair, but they did not get it. I tried to tell them “Imagine you have 5 candy bars, and another person has 200 candy bars. If somebody took 4 candy bars from you, you would have only 1 left. If somebody took 4 candy bars from the other person, they’d still have 196. Now, if you only had to give up half of 1 candy bar and the other person had to give up something like 40 or 80 candy bars, it would be a little more even. Still not totally fair, but it makes way more sense”. This kid just rejected that concept